Â鶹Éç

Ansøgningerne bedømmes af fondens videnskabelige bedømmerpaneler og eksterne fageksperter. Ansøgninger om rejsestipendier bliver behandlet administrativt af fonden.

Alle bedømmelser sker under iagttagelse af almindeligt accepterede retningslinjer for habilitet.

Biomedicinske og sundhedsvidenskabelige ansøgninger bliver vurderet i forhold til videnskabeligt indhold, ansøgers kvalifikationer og kvaliteten af det faglige miljø på værtsinstitutionen.

Fondens bestyrelse træffer den endelige beslutning om alle bevillinger. For visse programmer har bestyrelsen givet mandat til bedømmerpanelet om at træffe den endelige afgørelse. Du vil få afgørelsen på din ansøgning per e-mail kort tid efter afgørelsestidspunktet.

 

Retningslinjer for habilitet

Formål og grundprincipper
Â鶹Éç anvender nedenstÃ¥ende regler og principper om habilitet. De er inspireret af Forvaltningslovens regler pÃ¥ omrÃ¥det. Habilitetsreglerne har til formÃ¥l at sikre balancen mellem gennemsigtighed, upartiskhed og fagkundskab i Â鶹Éçs afgørelser.

Reglerne er gældende for Â鶹Éçs bestyrelsesmedlemmer, komitémedlemmer fra Â鶹Éçs uddelingskomitéer, eksterne bedømmere, direktionen og andre der har indflydelse pÃ¥ Â鶹Éçs uddelingsbeslutninger. Enhver af disse personer er forud for behandling af en konkret ansøgning forpligtet til at oplyse om forhold, der ville kunne give anledning til inhabilitet.

Enhver begrundet antagelse om inhabilitet undersøges sÃ¥ledes, at vurderingen af habilitetsspørgsmÃ¥l sker pÃ¥ fuldt oplyst grundlag. 

Afgørelser træffes med en balanceret afvejning af de konkrete omstændigheder, nærværende regelsæt, og med behørig hensyntagen til at sikre bedømmelsesudvalget det bedst mulige faglige grundlag i bedømmelserne.

Nærværende regelsæt finder kun anvendelse under egentlig ansøgningsbehandling, dvs. de finder ikke anvendelse under generelle drøftelser eller informationspunkter.

Retningslinjer i tilfælde af inhabilitet

Hvis der er tvivl om en bedømmers habilitet i en given situation, afgør den respektive udvalgs- eller komité-formand i samarbejde med ledelsen, om interessekonflikten medfører inhabilitet.

Vedkommende, der er inhabil i forhold til en konkret ansøgning, mÃ¥ ikke træffe afgørelse, deltage i afgørelser eller i øvrigt medvirke ved behandlingen af den pÃ¥gældende ansøgning. 

Undtagelse

I sjældne tilfælde kan komiteformanden og ledelsen beslutte, at ovenstÃ¥ende bestemmelser ikke finder anvendelse, hvis det vil betyde, at komiteen vil miste sin beslutningsdygtighed eller det af hensyn til komiteens faglige sammensætning vil give anledning til væsentlig betænkelighed, hvis medlemmet ikke deltager i bedømmelsen. Hvis foranstÃ¥ende undtagelsesbestemmelse tages i anvendelse, gøres de øvrige medlemmer, med den pÃ¥gældendes forudgÃ¥ende accept, opmærksom pÃ¥ den potentielle interessekonflikt, karakteren heraf og bevæggrundene for, at den pÃ¥gældende alligevel kan deltage i bedømmelserne. 

Forretningsorden for Internationaliseringspanel

(Kun på engelsk)

Rules of procedure for the Lundbeck Foundation's internal panels

related to the internationalisation of research

 

1. Composition of the panels
   1. Members of the panel for Travel Grants & Scientific Meetings are the Director of Science, the Senior Grant Manager, with input from the Foundation’s Grants & Prizes department (G&P)
   2. Members of the panel for Visiting Professorships and Senior Researcher Sabbaticals are Professor Michael Kjær and Professor Thomas Werge (members of the Research and Prize Committee) and Director of Science and the Senior Grant Manager, (both from G&P)

2. Duties of the panels
   1. It is the duty of the panels to implement decisions within the scope of the grant allocation mandate given by the Foundation’s Board of Trustees

3. Evaluation of applications
   1. Applications are reviewed according to the criteria set out by the Foundation’s Board of Trustees in the grant mandate
   2. Any issues of impartiality must be settled before applications are reviewed
   3. Applications within the scope of the panel for Travel Grants & Scientific Meetings are reviewed by the Director of Science and the Senior Grant Manager,
   4. Applications within the scope of the panel for Visiting Professorships are reviewed by the Director of Science and the Senior Grant Manager, who prepare a recommendation either for a grant or for rejection. Recommendations are presented to Professor Thomas Werge (member of the Research and Prize Committee) who takes the final decision in the form of a written statement to award a grant or reject the application
   5. Applications within the scope of the panel for Senior Researcher Sabbaticals are reviewed by the Director of Science and the Senior Grant Manager, who prepare a recommendation either for a grant or for rejection. Recommendations are presented to Professor Michael Kjær (member of the Research and Prize Committee) who takes the final decision in the form of a written statement to award a grant or reject the application
   6. In the event of impartiality of a member of Research and Prize Committee to review an application, according to paragraphs d. and e. above, G&P ensures that the final review is taken over by another member of the Research and Prize Committee with the relevant capabilities.

4. Decisions of the panels

   1. The panels review applications regularly and take decisions to award a grant or reject the application. The decisions of the panels are documented in the Foundation’s application system (LANAS).

5. Reporting on the work and decisions of the panels

   1. G&P reports its decisions to the Foundation’s Board of Trustees at a yearly update.

6. Impartiality
   1. Members of the panels are subject to the Foundation’s general rules on impartiality and access to the Foundation’s funds, cf. the Foundation’s code of practice on the subject
   2. Members of the panels have a duty to notify G&P of any circumstances which may give rise to doubt about the member’s impartiality.

7. Confidentiality
   1. Members of the panels have a duty of confidentiality regarding information which may come to their notice in their capacity as a member.

8. Acceptance of the rules of procedure
   1. A new Board member of the panels must accept the rules of procedure by signing the original rules in force from time to time.

9. Amendments to the rules of procedure
   1. These rules of procedure may be amended by the Foundation’s Board of Trustees. The rules of procedure may be amended if required by the Board of Trustees. However, they are reviewed at least once a year with a view to prospective adjustments.

Approved by Foundation’s Board of Trustees on March 12, 2024.